“..we
keep shuffling around the same deck of cards, hoping that this
meaningless exercise will somehow make a difference. Hope abounds
when the US elects its most progressive President in decades — but
even he ends up bailing out Wall Street at the expense of millions of
families who lose their homes. Heck, he even keeps a personal kill
list and
forsakes his #1 election promise to close Guantanamo!
In the UK, a Liberal leader pledges never
to
raise tuition fees — only to abandon this promise the moment he
smells power.
Similarly,
a sigh of relief resounds across Europe when France elects its first
Socialist President in two decades. Surely his victory will hail the
end of Merkel’s austerity pact for the eurozone? ‘Lo and behold:
only a few months later Hollande is suddenly Merkel’s closest ally,
happily “turning
the screws on Greece”
and quietly forgetting about his election promise to rip up the
eurozone austerity pact. In the end, everybody bows before the power
of the market.
Clearly
the divorce between politics and power has instilled great fear and
confusion in the electorate. Like a flock of panicking sheep, voters
head towards the political fringes, desperately clinging on to the
idea that it’s the parties
and
their leaders who are at fault, not the system as such. Unwilling to
face the reality of national governments that no longer possess true
fiscal or monetary policy
autonomy, voters continue to hate the player; not the game.
In the
process, national elections are reduced to some meaningless
provincial popularity contest. Like “survivors” in some stupid
reality TV show, politicians try their very best to avoid being voted
off the island. Election campaigns degrade into marketing campaigns
as the electorate is bombarded with flashy Google and TV ads, party
posters and random party paraphernalia in the streets. An election
victory is celebrated like a World Cup win. Somehow everyone seems to
believe that this is a completely natural way of organizing society.
Both
ordinary citizens (those “too unsophisticated” for the spectacle)
and critical thinkers (those “too sophisticated” for the new
culture of one-liners) are filtered out of public view in a sort of
quasi-natural selection process that systematically favors the
technocratic mediocrity of bland career politicians over the great
diversity and complexity of opinions that society has to offer. Given
enough time, electoral politics automatically descends into some
childish blame game that no one really takes seriously anymore.
Cookie-cutter
election programs, cheap sloganeering, negative publicity and
inauthentic, overly-manufactured interviews riddled with lies,
insults and and clichés take all the creativity, joy and weight out
of the art of public debate. Instead of talking about issues, we now
talk about personalities. Representative democracy has long since
ceased to be about competing visions for the future of society. With
the owners out of reach, we are relegated to electing managers...”
From Roarmag.
From Roarmag.
Ingen kommentarer:
Send en kommentar